Google Play App Store

Legal NewsNews Legal BlogsLaw Blogs Branding BlogsJudgements Branding BlogsBranding Blogs All Legal News and BlogsAll Blogs Legal JobsLaw Jobs

 Vrede dairy farm project: Public Protector's  office and Mkhwebane will have to pay costs Vrede dairy farm project: Public Protector's office and Mkhwebane will have to pay costs

Bronze medal Reporter william Posted 16 Aug 2019 Read More News and Blogs
 Vrede dairy farm project: Public Protector's  office and Mkhwebane will have to pay costs

 

More woes for the Public Protector came in the form of a ruling of the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria on Thursday, which found that her office as well as she is responsible for some of the legal costs in her personal capacity in the Vrede dairy farm matter.

Judge Ronel Tolmay ordered that the Public Protector's office must pay 85% of the costs of DA on an attorney and client scale. It  must also pay 85% of the costs of Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution (Casac). 

Busisiwe Mkhwebane must pay 7.5% of the costs of the DA and 7.5% of the costs of Casac in her personal capacity. 

In her ruling, judge Ronel Tolmay said the Public Protector failed the people of the country in the way she dealt with her investigation in the Estina dairy farm matter. 

She said Mkhwebane failed completely to institute her constitutional duties but instead turned a "blind eye" when she failed to investigate the third complainant. 

Tolmay said beneficiaries of the Estina dairy farm were deprived of their one chance to create a better life for themselves.

In May this year, Tolmay found that advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane's report was unconstitutional and invalid and set it aside.

The court found that she failed in her duties to investigate and report on the Free State project and reserved judgment on costs.

The application was lodged by the DA and Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution (Casac).

In the application, the DA's advocate Janice Bleazard argued that Mkhwebane failed to investigate a complaint lodged by the party's Roy Jankielsohn. 

Between 2013 and 2016, Jankielsohn submitted three complaints to the Public Protector, calling on the role of the provincial government and then Free State premier Ace Magashule to be probed.

However, when Mkhwebane assumed office in October 2016, she inherited a provisional report prepared by her predecessor, Thuli Madonsela.

In 2018, Mkhwebane quietly released the report, highlighting procurement irregularities, "gross negligence" and maladministration related to the controversial project.

As remedial action, she recommended that Magashule "initiate and institute disciplinary action against all implicated officials involved in the Vrede dairy project".

The DA felt that Mkhwebane was not "prudent" in her investigation and that senior politicians implicated in the project were not interviewed.

The DA argued that when she assumed office, Mkhwebane was required to conduct a preliminary investigation into the merits of Jankielsohn's complaint or refer the matter to another appropriate investigative authority.

Casac argued that the report did not include findings relating to the "high-level politicians that played a central role in the project".

One hundred black emerging farmers were promised five cows each as part of the empowerment scheme, but never received them.

Gifted to Estina in 2013 under a free 99-year lease by the provincial agriculture department, the farm has been one of the most scandalous transactions between the Guptas and a government entity.

The #GuptaLeaks revealed last year how at least R30m paid to the Guptas via the farm ended up funding the family's lavish Sun City wedding in 2013. 

https://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/vrede-dairy-farm-project-public-protectors-office-and-mkhwebane-will-have-to-pay-costs-20190815

Note:- We try our level best to avoid any kind of abusive content posted by users. Kindly report to us if you notice any. This report may be copied from a news/channel/magazine/blog/site for knowledge sharing, where PathLegal DISCLAIM any ownership of the content posted and offer NO warranty about the data. In case of any objection, please do write to [email protected]

Copyright @ Pathmpor Consultants Pvt Ltd

F

r

e

e


A

d

v

i

c

e